Research Article

Time Factor Influencing Technology Integration in Social Studies Teaching in Jordanian School

Mohammad Abed Latif Mohammad Smadi 1 * , Arumugam Raman 1
More Detail
1 School of Education and Modern Languages (SEML), University Utara Malaysia, MALAYSIA* Corresponding Author
European Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education, 1(1), 2020, e02004, https://doi.org/10.30935/ejimed/8351
OPEN ACCESS   1634 Views   1594 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this qualitative research study was to examine the time factor influencing technology integration in social studies teaching in a Jordanian school. The case study method was chosen because the research questions sought to explore time factor influencing technology integration in teaching. In Jordan, little research qualitative empirical research has investigated the level of the time of technology has been carried out for educational purposes. Therefore, this paper intends to identify the importance of the time factor of teachers in technology integration in teaching. These data were analysed using a thematic analysis approach, semi-structured interview interviews and observation were used as instruments to collect data. Five social studies teachers participated in this study. Findings showed that all of the teachers have mentioned that the time was one of the most important factors that affected the technology integration in their teaching. Where most of the responses indicated that, the time was a major obstacle in front of their technology integration. Furthermore, I found out through my classroom observations that the time was an obstacle for all teachers.

CITATION (APA)

Smadi, M. A. L. M., & Raman, A. (2020). Time Factor Influencing Technology Integration in Social Studies Teaching in Jordanian School. European Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education, 1(1), e02004. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejimed/8351

REFERENCES

  1. Abuhmaid, A. (2008). An analysis of ICT integration within the Jordanian education system (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). University of Technology, Sydney. Retrieved from https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/bitstream/10453/20013/2/02whole.pdf
  2. Agyei, D. D., & Voogt, J. M. (2011). Exploring the potential of the will, skill, tool model in Ghana: Predicting prospective and practicing teachers’ use of technology. Computers & Education, 56(1), 91-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu. 2010.08.017
  3. Al Mulhim, E. (2014). The barriers to the use of ICT in teaching in Saudi Arabia: A review of the literature. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(6), 487-493.
  4. Al-Bataineh, M., & Anderson, S. (2015). Jordanian social studies teachers’ perceptions of competency needed for implementing technology in the classroom. Contemporary Educational Technology, 6(1), 38-61. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6138
  5. Al-Bataineh, M. T. (2014). Jordanian social studies teachers’ attitudes and their perceptions of competency needed for implementing technology in their classrooms (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Colorado State University. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10217/80134
  6. Aldhafeeri, F., Palaiologou, I., & Folorunsho, A. (2016). Integration of digital technologies into play-based pedagogy in Kuwaiti early childhood education: Teachers’ views, attitudes and aptitudes. International Journal of Early Years Education, 24(3), 342-360. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2016.1172477
  7. Al-Ghazo, A. (2018). Jordanian EFL students’ attitudes toward using World Wide Web net and its’ effect on their linguistic proficiency. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 7(2), 82-90. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.2p.82
  8. Al-Ruz, J., & Khasawneh, S. (2011). Jordanian pre-service teachers’ and technology integration: A human resource development approach, Educational Technology and Society, 1(14), 77-87. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/jeductechsoci. 14.4.77.pdf
  9. Al-Zaidiyeen, N. J., Mei, L. L., & Fook, F. S. (2010). Teachers’ attitudes and levels of technology use in classrooms: The case of Jordan schools. International Education Studies, 3(2), 211-219. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v3n2p211
  10. Ames, C. W. (2017). Teacher perceptions of factors influencing technology integration in K-12 Schools (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Utah State University. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/5277
  11. Bandyopadhyay, A. (2013). Technology integration before student outcomes: Factors affecting teacher adoption of technology in India. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). University of Maryland, College Park. Retrieved from https://drum.lib.umd.edu/bitstream/handle/1903/14067/Bandyopadhyay_umd_0117E_14150.pdf;sequence=1
  12. Bauland, D. (2012). Opinion and practice in a tech-successful elementary school: The 21st century classroom (Masters Dissertations). University of Arizona.
  13. Beaudry, D. (2011). Technology and fifth grade teaching: a study of teacher reported classroom practice, professional development, access, and support. (Doctoral Dissertation). Florida Atlantic University.
  14. Beeson, M. W. (2013). The Influence of Teacher Beliefs and Knowledge on Planning for Technology Integration in Technology-Rich Classrooms (Doctoral Dissertation). The University of North Carolina.
  15. Blackwell, C. K., Lauricella, A. R., & Wartella, E. (2014). Factors influencing digital technology use in early childhood education. Computers & Education, 77, 82-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.013
  16. Coleman, L. O., Gibson, P., Cotton, S. R., Howell-Moroney, M., & Stringer, K. (2016). Integrating computing across the curriculum: The impact of internal barriers and training intensity on computer integration in the elementary school classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(2), 275-294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115616645
  17. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, 16(4), 473-475. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839915580941
  18. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
  19. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
  20. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  21. Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5
  22. Hu, H., & Garimella, U. (2014). iPads for STEM teachers: A case study on perceived usefulness, perceived proficiency, intention to adopt, and integration in K-12 instruction. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 7(1), 49-66. https://doi.org/10.18785/jetde.0701.04
  23. Humble-Thaden, M. B. (2012). Tools for school: Student fluency and perception of cell phones used for learning (Doctoral dissertation). University of North Dakota.
  24. Jordanian Ministry of Education. (2019). Strategic Plan for the Ministry of Education. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1935938
  25. Kerckaert, S., Vanderline, R., & van Brakk, J. (2015). The role of ICT in early childhood education: Scale development and research on ICT use and influencing factors. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 23(2), 183-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2015.1016804
  26. Kopcha, T. J. (2010). A systems-based approach to technology integration using mentoring and communities of practice. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58, 175-190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-00-9095-4
  27. Lamar, B., Shetia, C., Samms-Brown, C., Iii, B., & Ulysses, J. (2016). Technology acceptance in a sample of college students. International Journal of Education Research, 11(1),15-26.
  28. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  29. Nixon, T. S. (2013). Mobile devices and the teacher perceived barriers impacting effective integration in the K-5 Classroom (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Phoenix.
  30. Ozdemir, S. (2017). Basic technology competencies, attitude towards computer assisted education and usage of technologies in Turkish lesson: A correlation. International Education Studies, 10(4), 160-171. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n4p160
  31. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative interviewing. In Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed., pp. 344-347). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  32. Pittman, T., & Gaines, T. (2015). Technology integration in third, fourth and fifth grade classrooms in a Florida school district. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(4), 539-554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9391-8
  33. Prestridge, S. (2012). The beliefs behind the teacher that influences their ICT practices. Computers & education, 58(1), 449-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.028
  34. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2013) Research methods for business: A skill building approach (6th ed.). West Sussex, UK: John Wiley and Sons.
  35. Shin, W. S. (2015). Teachers’ use of technology and its influencing factors in Korean elementary schools. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(4), 461-476. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2014.915229
  36. Strange, M. (2018). Exploring K-8 teacher educational technology use: An instrument development study (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Piedmont College. Retrieved from https://media.proquest.com/media/pq/classic/doc/4327305543/fmt/ai/rep/NPDFz%BO4iiyIVhw%2BiouD%2Ba86kB5aJKg%3D
  37. Teo, T., Zhou, M., & Noyes, J. (2016). Teachers and technology: Development of an extended theory of planned behavior. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(6), 1033-1052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9446-5
  38. Vatanartiran, S., & Karadeniz, S. (2015). A needs analysis for technology integration Plan: Challenges and needs of teachers. Contemporary Educational Technology, 6(3), 206-220. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6150
  39. Winterhalder, J. E. (2017). Teachers’ perceptions and experiences in implementing mobile devices into their teaching (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Walden University. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4480&context=dissertations
  40. Yusop, F. D. (2015). A dataset of factors that influence preservice teachers’ intentions to use Web 2.0 technologies in future teaching practices. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(5), 1075-1080. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12330