Research Article

University Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Distance Learning During COVID-19 Pandemic: Hurdles, Challenges, and Take-away Lessons

Hassane Razkane 1 * , Adil Youssef Sayeh 1 , Mohamed Yeou 1
More Detail
1 Applied Language and Culture Studies Lab (ALCS), Chouaib Doukkali University, MOROCCO* Corresponding Author
European Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education, 3(1), 2022, e02201,
Published: 20 December 2021
OPEN ACCESS   2613 Views   2873 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)


The current paper discussed the challenges encountered by university teachers during online education in Morocco. It also investigated teachers’ attitudes towards their distance teaching experience. 156 Chouaib Doukkali University teachers, (male=85 and female=71) were administered an online questionnaire via their professional email addresses. The participants, belonging to five faculties, were kindly invited to fill out the question within two weeks. For triangulation purposes, 20 (male=12 and females=8) informants were interviewed about their experience with distance education. Quantitative data were analyzed through descriptive statistics to extract demographic characteristics of the participants and provide measurements of mean values, standard deviations, and frequencies of the variables. Qualitative data were thematically analyzed. Findings showed that although the vast majority of the respondents used online teaching, many faced both technical and logistical barriers, which were reported to impede the good delivery of lessons. Also, the majority of the participants showed a negative attitude towards the COVID-19 online teaching experience. The study discusses some implications for online teaching practice in tertiary education in Morocco.


Razkane, H., Sayeh, A. Y., & Yeou, M. (2022). University Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Distance Learning During COVID-19 Pandemic: Hurdles, Challenges, and Take-away Lessons. European Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education, 3(1), e02201.


  1. Abuhammad, S. (2020). Barriers to distance learning during the COVID-19 outbreak: A qualitative review from parents’ perspective. Heliyon, 6(11), e05482.
  2. Adov, L., & Mäeots, M. (2021). What can we learn about science teachers’ technology use during the COVID-19 pandemic? Education Sciences, 11(6), 255.
  3. Al-Anezi, Y. H., & Alajmi, S. M. (2021). Factors that influence English teachers’ acceptance and use of e-learning technologies. International Education Studies, 14(9), 15-27.
  4. Ali, W. (2020). Online and remote learning in higher education institutes: A necessity in light of COVID-19 pandemic. Higher Education Studies, 10(3), 16-25.
  5. Amir, L. R., Tanti, I., Maharani, D. A., Wimardhani, Y. S., Julia, V., Sulijaya, B., & Puspitawati, R. (2020). Student perspective of classroom and distance learning during COVID-19 pandemic in the undergraduate dental study program Universitas Indonesia. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 1-8.
  6. Aytac, T. (2021). The problems faced by teachers in Turkey during the COVID-19 pandemic and their opinions. International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(1), 2021.
  7. Azhari, B., & Fajri, I. (2021). Distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: School closure in Indonesia. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1-21.
  8. Bagozzi, R. P., Davis, Fre, D. D., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Development and test of a theory of technological learning and usage. Human Relations, 45(7), 659-686.
  9. Balci, T., Temiz, C. N., & Sivrikaya, A. H. (2021). Transition to distance education in COVID-19 period: Turkish pre-service teachers’ e-learning attitudes and readiness levels. Journal of Educational Issues, 7(1), 296.
  10. Danchikov, E. A., Prodanova, N. A., Kovalenko, Y. N., & Bondarenko, T. G. (2021). Using different approaches to organizing distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: Opportunities and disadvantages. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S1), 587-595.
  11. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-339.
  12. Egbert, J., Paulus, T. M., & Nakamichi, Y. (2002). The impact of call instruction on classroom computer use: A foundation for rethinking technology in teacher education. Language Learning and Technology, 6(3), 108-126.
  13. Fatoni, Arifiati, N., Nurkhayati, E., Nurdiawati, E., Fidziah, Pamungkas, G., Adha, S., Irawan, Purwanto, A., Julyanto, O., & Azizi, E. (2020). University students online learning system during COVID-19 pandemic: Advantages, constraints and solutions, Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11(7), 570-576.
  14. Gialamas, V., & Nikolopoulou, K. (2010). In-service and pre-service early childhood teachers’ views and intentions about ICT use in early childhood settings: A comparative study. Computers and Education, 55(1), 333-341.
  15. Ibrohim, Sudrajat, A. K., & Saefi, M. (2021). Assessing Indonesian teacher’s perspective on the implementation of distance learning due to COVID-19 based on online survey. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(COVID-19 Special Issue), 46-59.
  16. Kast, J., Lindner, K. T., Gutschik, A., & Schwab, S. (2021). Austrian teachers’ attitudes and self-efficacy beliefs regarding at-risk students during home learning due to COVID-19. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 36(1), 114-126.
  17. Lestiyanawati, R. (2020). The strategies and problems faced by Indonesian teachers in conducting e-learning during COVID-19 outbreak. CLLiENT (Culture, Literature, Linguistics, and English Teaching), 2(1), 71-82.
  18. Liu, M., Moore, Z., Graham, L., & Lee, S. (2002). A look at the research on computer-based technology use in second language learning: Review of literature from 1990-2000. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(3), 250-273.
  19. Macaruso, P., & Rodman, A. (2011). Benefits of computer-assisted instruction to support reading acquisition in English language learners. Bilingual Research Journal, 34(3), 301-315.
  20. Mansur, H., Jumadi, Mastur, Utama, A. H., & Prastitasari, H. (2021). The problem of distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ilkogretim Online [Elementary Education Online], 20(4), 168-175.
  21. Maphosa, V. (2021). Teachers’ perspectives on remote-based teaching and learning in the COVID-19 era: Rethinking technology availability and suitability in Zimbabwe. European Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education, 2(1), e02105.
  22. Migocka-Patrzałek, M., Dubińska-Magiera, M., Krysiński, D., & Nowicki, S. (2021). The attitude of the academic community towards distance learning: A lesson from a national lockdown. The Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 19(4), 262-281.
  23. Mohammadi, M. K., Mohibbi, A. A., & Hedayati, M. H. (2021). Investigating the challenges and factors influencing the use of the learning management system during the COVID-19 pandemic in Afghanistan. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 5165-5198.
  24. Muir-Herzig, R. G. (2004). Technology and its impact in the classroom. Computers and Education, 42(2), 111-131.
  25. Rafique, H., Almagrabi, A. O., Shamim, A., Anwar, F., & Bashir, A. K. (2020). Investigating the acceptance of mobile library applications with an extended technology acceptance model (TAM). Computers and Education, 145, 103732.
  26. Rannastu-Avalos, M., & Siiman, L. A. (2020). Challenges for distance learning and online collaboration in the time of COVID-19: Interviews with science teachers. In A. Nolte, C. Alvarez, R. Hishiyama, I. A. Chounta, M. Rodríguez-Triana, & T. Inoue T (Eds.), Collaboration technologies and social computing. CollabTech 2020 (pp. 128-142). Springer, Cham.
  27. Sari, T., & Nayir, F. (2020). Challenges in distance education during the (Covid-19) pandemic period. Qualitative Research in Education, 9(3), 328-360.
  28. Sayeh, A. Y., & Razkane, H. (2021). Moroccan high school EFL teachers’ attitudes and anxiety on using Microsoft Teams platform. TESOL and Technology Studies, 2(2), 29-40.
  29. Sukendro, S., Habibi, A., Khaeruddin, K., Indrayana, B., Syahruddin, S., Makadada, F. A., & Hakim, H. (2020). Using an extended Technology Acceptance Model to understand students’ use of e-learning during COVID-19: Indonesian sport science education context. Heliyon, 6(11), e05410.
  30. Talidong, K. J. B., & Toquero, C. M. D. (2021). Facing COVID-19 through emergency online education anchored in Khan’s framework: Case of Philippine teachers in Xi’an, China. European Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education, 2(1), e02104.
  31. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
  32. Warschauer, M. (2000). Technology and school reform: A view from both sides of the tracks. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8, 4.
  33. Warschauer, M. (2000a). Online learning in second language classrooms. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 41-58). Cambridge University Press.
  34. World Health Organization. (2020).
  35. Yeou, M. (2016). An investigation of students’ acceptance of Moodle in a blended learning setting using technology acceptance model. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 44(3), 300-318.
  36. Ziyad, H. (2016). Technology-mediated ELT writing: Acceptance and engagement in an online Moodle course. Contemporary Educational Technology, 7(4), 314-330.